#

Shocking Losses from These So-Called 'Premium' Signal Services

15 Jun 2025

đź’Ą Introduction: When “Premium” Means Losing Money

In the fast-paced world of crypto, signal providers promise profits, convenience, and the illusion of a shortcut to financial freedom. But the truth is often far from the marketing hype. While some signal providers deliver, many others quietly rack up losses behind the scenes — leaving unsuspecting traders in the red. Today, we expose six such “premium” services hosted on TraderStat.com that have been bleeding traders dry, despite flashy branding and bold promises.


📉 The Cold, Hard Numbers: Who’s Losing and How Much?

We analyzed six paid signal providers: Bull Exclusive Premium, Bulls Vip, Lizard Premium, Crypto Swings, Platter Premium, and Binance Pro Elite Crypto. All are branded as premium services, yet their results are anything but.

Provider Total Profit (%) Accuracy Rate (%) Total Trades  
Bull Exclusive Premium -6.88% 33.33% 33  
Bulls Vip -3.85% 73.91% 23  
Lizard Premium -2.24% 20.00% 5  
Crypto Swings -1.99% 40.00% 5  
Platter Premium -0.98% 36.84% 19  
Binance Pro Elite Crypto -0.24% 33.33% 3  


🚨 What Do These Numbers Really Mean?

Let’s break this down:

  • Bull Exclusive Premium recorded the worst loss at -6.88% and an abysmal 33.33% win rate — essentially guessing trades.

  • Lizard Premium and Crypto Swings, while small in trade volume, posted terrible accuracy rates of 20% and 40% respectively. That’s roulette-level risk.

  • Even Bulls Vip, despite a seemingly high 73.91% accuracy, still managed a net loss of -3.85% — proving that win rate alone doesn’t guarantee profits.

  • Binance Pro Elite Crypto, though with only 3 trades, also fell into the red at -0.24%, with only 1 in 3 trades successful.

📉 Bottom line: All six “premium” services lost money. And in many cases, these providers still have subscribers paying monthly fees — unaware that the signals they follow are statistically hurting their portfolios.


đź§  Why Do Traders Fall for These Providers?

  1. Branding and Hype – Names like “Exclusive” and “Elite” trick new traders into assuming credibility.

  2. Short-Term Survivorship Bias – Traders often join after seeing a few good calls, missing the full performance picture.

  3. No Risk Disclosure – Many providers fail to mention drawdowns, strategy logic, or risk models.

This combination creates a perfect trap for new and even experienced traders seeking shortcuts.


âś… What You Should Be Looking For in a Signal Provider

Before you pay another subscription fee, ask yourself:

  • Is their full trading history transparent and audited? If not, run.

  • Are they consistently profitable over 50+ trades? A sample of 3–10 trades proves nothing.

  • Do they use proper risk management and explain their strategy? Real traders don’t hide their logic.

  • Are they ranked on independent platforms like TraderStat.com? Data beats marketing.


⚠️ Conclusion: Stop Paying to Lose Money

In a market where every percent matters, blindly following paid signals from unvetted providers can be financial suicide. The data doesn’t lie — these six “premium” signal groups all posted negative returns, draining traders’ wallets instead of filling them.

If you’re serious about protecting your capital:

  • Research before subscribing.

  • Demand transparency, track records, and performance metrics.

  • Use platforms like TraderStat.com to verify providers before risking a dollar.

đź’¬ Trading is hard enough — don’t let poor signals make it harder.