
Shocking Losses from These So-Called 'Premium' Signal Services
đź’Ą Introduction: When “Premium” Means Losing Money
In the fast-paced world of crypto, signal providers promise profits, convenience, and the illusion of a shortcut to financial freedom. But the truth is often far from the marketing hype. While some signal providers deliver, many others quietly rack up losses behind the scenes — leaving unsuspecting traders in the red. Today, we expose six such “premium” services hosted on TraderStat.com that have been bleeding traders dry, despite flashy branding and bold promises.
📉 The Cold, Hard Numbers: Who’s Losing and How Much?
We analyzed six paid signal providers: Bull Exclusive Premium, Bulls Vip, Lizard Premium, Crypto Swings, Platter Premium, and Binance Pro Elite Crypto. All are branded as premium services, yet their results are anything but.
Provider | Total Profit (%) | Accuracy Rate (%) | Total Trades | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bull Exclusive Premium | -6.88% | 33.33% | 33 | |
Bulls Vip | -3.85% | 73.91% | 23 | |
Lizard Premium | -2.24% | 20.00% | 5 | |
Crypto Swings | -1.99% | 40.00% | 5 | |
Platter Premium | -0.98% | 36.84% | 19 | |
Binance Pro Elite Crypto | -0.24% | 33.33% | 3 |
🚨 What Do These Numbers Really Mean?
Let’s break this down:
-
Bull Exclusive Premium recorded the worst loss at -6.88% and an abysmal 33.33% win rate — essentially guessing trades.
-
Lizard Premium and Crypto Swings, while small in trade volume, posted terrible accuracy rates of 20% and 40% respectively. That’s roulette-level risk.
-
Even Bulls Vip, despite a seemingly high 73.91% accuracy, still managed a net loss of -3.85% — proving that win rate alone doesn’t guarantee profits.
-
Binance Pro Elite Crypto, though with only 3 trades, also fell into the red at -0.24%, with only 1 in 3 trades successful.
📉 Bottom line: All six “premium” services lost money. And in many cases, these providers still have subscribers paying monthly fees — unaware that the signals they follow are statistically hurting their portfolios.
đź§ Why Do Traders Fall for These Providers?
-
Branding and Hype – Names like “Exclusive” and “Elite” trick new traders into assuming credibility.
-
Short-Term Survivorship Bias – Traders often join after seeing a few good calls, missing the full performance picture.
-
No Risk Disclosure – Many providers fail to mention drawdowns, strategy logic, or risk models.
This combination creates a perfect trap for new and even experienced traders seeking shortcuts.
âś… What You Should Be Looking For in a Signal Provider
Before you pay another subscription fee, ask yourself:
-
Is their full trading history transparent and audited? If not, run.
-
Are they consistently profitable over 50+ trades? A sample of 3–10 trades proves nothing.
-
Do they use proper risk management and explain their strategy? Real traders don’t hide their logic.
-
Are they ranked on independent platforms like TraderStat.com? Data beats marketing.
⚠️ Conclusion: Stop Paying to Lose Money
In a market where every percent matters, blindly following paid signals from unvetted providers can be financial suicide. The data doesn’t lie — these six “premium” signal groups all posted negative returns, draining traders’ wallets instead of filling them.
If you’re serious about protecting your capital:
-
Research before subscribing.
-
Demand transparency, track records, and performance metrics.
-
Use platforms like TraderStat.com to verify providers before risking a dollar.
đź’¬ Trading is hard enough — don’t let poor signals make it harder.