Traders
← Back to Forex Traders
VA

VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals) Review

Forex rank unavailable

A public post from 2026-10-05 is a useful starting point for VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals). Inspect the full source to distinguish a new trading setup from commentary or a retrospective result before judging the sales pitch. This review brings together the channel evidence, available results and the questions still open about paid access.

Read the full review
Free Ideas
Recorded results
Signals359
Accuracy33.7%
Signal history191 days
Sum of outcomes+23,820.3 pips
Paid signals
Recorded results
Signals418
Accuracy41.1%
Signal history—
Sum of outcomes-106,525.6 pips
Forex · public-channel reviewPublic channel observed 2026-10-05Updated 2026-10-12

Research by TraderStat Team · editorial process

VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals) review: free channel, costs and trading evidence

A public post from 2026-10-05 is a useful starting point for VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals). Inspect the full source to distinguish a new trading setup from commentary or a retrospective result before judging the sales pitch. This review brings together the channel evidence, available results and the questions still open about paid access.

Telegram audience
42.7KRounded display · 2026-10-05[1]
Public text sample
15 postsObserved web view, not total history[2]
Free + Paid result
-82,705.3 pips777 recorded signals[3]

Based on a dated public-channel sample and available profile data. Completion of a separate 200-signal audit and VIP account performance are not established by this review. Research scope

Related provider research

Read this provider's section in our published comparisons, including the product information and limitations checked for that article.

  • Best Forex Signals in 2026: Six Services Compared

    Article evidence dated October 9, 2026 — website checks; channel snapshots October 5

    From the published comparison:

    VasilyTrader’s website separates education, coaching, VIP signals and copy trading. Its public channel is therefore worth inspecting if you want to learn how a chart view is developed, not simply receive a buy-or-sell message. A saved October 5 EUR/JPY example discusses a liquidity-sweep scenario.

    That is a starting point for judging explanation. It does not establish whether every scenario becomes an executed trade or what the paid programme costs today. Decide which product you want and ask for its own price and recent history. An education package and a signal subscription should not be compared as if they were the same purchase.

At a glance: pros & cons

What works well

  • An exact channel to inspect

    This review is tied to @vasilytrading and its market-specific TraderStat profile, rather than a display-name match.[1]

  • Public examples before a subscription

    2 dated post excerpts below link to their originals. You can inspect the wording and format directly.[2]

  • Source-defined outcomes available

    1 completed Free outcomes use source-defined conditions in the loaded history.[3]

What to watch

  • VIP execution is not established

    Public posts and imported results do not establish the fills, fees or returns a paying subscriber received.[4]

  • Official brand ownership needs confirmation

    The saved channel is identified, but reciprocal website links and common ownership have not been established here.[1]

  • Modelled outcomes need separate reading

    358 completed Free outcomes use the accepted entry/stop model; these are not broker executions.[3][4]

Section 01 · Provider identity

The channel behind VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals)

This review follows @vasilytrading, bound to the Forex profile shown here. The channel-to-profile match is recorded; independent confirmation of official brand ownership remains open. Another account with the same logo or a similar name is a separate identity until its connection is established.[1]

Section 02 · Free channel

What can you see without paying?

15 original text-bearing posts were visible in the saved web sample. The excerpts below are examples of the publishing format, not a consecutive trading test. Open the dated source to see the full message and later context.[2]

One selected post is labelled Trade levels in the saved sample. That label alone does not establish executable instructions: inspect the instrument, direction, entry, stop and targets in the full original. A later update or result recap must stay attached to the original idea rather than become another winning signal.[2][4]

Trade levels · 2026-10-05
“#EURJPY : Is That a Liquidity Sweep 🇪🇺 🇯🇵 📉 EURJPY may pull back after a sell-side liquidity sweep on an houlry”
Read the original post
Market commentary · 2026-10-02
“MarketBreakdown | GOLD, EURUSD, SILVER, US100 Here are the updates & outlook for multiple instruments in my watch list. 1️⃣ #GOLD #XAUUSD”
Read the original post

Section 03 · VIP pricing

Paid access: what is established about the cost?

The public snapshot contains commercial language about access, membership or another service. A complete current tariff and matching renewal/refund terms have not been established for this review, so no subscription price is presented as confirmed.[2]

A useful price comparison needs the billing period, markets included, renewal rule and refund conditions together. A long-plan discount or broker-linked offer cannot tell you whether the underlying signal service suits your execution style.[4]

Section 04 · Audience

42.7K subscribers: look beyond the header

Audience display
42.7K2026-10-05[1]
Median sample views
2,04015 posts with counters · mixed ages[2]

The header showed 42.7K subscribers when observed. Across 15 visible original text posts with positive counters, the median was 2,040 views. The sample includes different post ages and content types, including promotion. This describes the saved web sample, not typical daily reach.[1][2]

A large gap between subscribers and views is a question to investigate, not proof of purchased followers. Inactive readers, post age, promotion and how Telegram counts views all matter. This review makes no bot-audience finding from these counters.[2]

Section 05 · Results & claims

Performance statements versus the trading record

This review does not endorse a promotional win rate or promised return. A claim needs a dated numerator, denominator and treatment of open trades before it can be compared with the site's recorded outcomes. The evidence below focuses on the loaded profile instead.[4]

Section 06 · Customer reviews

Independent customer feedback

Third-party customer reviews have not been assessed for this VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals) snapshot. There is no independently checked star rating or customer-consensus claim here. Testimonials reposted by a provider, if encountered, should remain clearly separate from feedback hosted by an outside platform.[2]

The useful questions for a later feedback review are specific: did access arrive after payment, how were losing trades handled, were refunds honoured, and did support respond? A claim about those experiences needs its original dated review and any provider reply.[4]

Section 07 · Signal history

What the TraderStat numbers can tell you

Free completed
359Recorded result +23,820.3 pips[3]
Paid completed
418Recorded result -106,525.6 pips[3]
Avg. / signal
-106.4 pipsSame denominator as the directory[3]

The loaded directory figures combine 777 Free + effective Paid signals with a recorded total of -82,705.3 pips and an average of -106.4 pips per signal. The combined result is not positive, so this provider does not qualify for the site's positive-result table.[3][4]

The available Free history spans 2026-03-03 to 2026-09-10 (UTC). It contains 1 completed source-defined outcomes and 358 completed modelled outcomes. These groups remain distinct, and the short channel examples above are not a substitute for that full history.[3]

Paid figures come from the owner-supplied aggregate import dated 2026-09-15. This import replaces the older Paid bucket; it is not added twice and is not an independent audit of subscriber executions.[3][4]

How we checked: sample and limitations

Checked 2026-10-05 UTC. The article archive is separate from the current directory selection.

  • The selected 50 Forex / 50 Crypto cohort is an editorial priority list, not a worldwide top-100 or reliability ranking.
  • The public web sample is not a consecutive 200-signal audit. This review does not claim that the 200-signal check is complete.
  • Post examples use short original excerpts; a trade-level text label does not establish a complete executable order or its outcome.
  • Third-party customer reviews, current prices and complete product terms have not been independently assessed for this public-channel review.
  • View counts are cumulative across posts of different ages, include promotion and may include forwarded-copy views; they are not unique users or first-day reach.
  • Trading metrics follow the loaded profile and may come from a saved snapshot. The channel-observation date is not a refresh date for trading statistics.
  • Official brand identity and common ownership remain unconfirmed beyond the stored channel binding.
Full verification methodology

Before you decide

Questions & answers

01Which VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals) channel does this review cover?

The exact stored channel is @vasilytrading: https://t.me/vasilytrading. Official brand ownership beyond this stored binding remains unconfirmed. The market here is Forex.[1]

02What is available in the free channel?

15 original text-bearing posts were visible in the saved web sample. The excerpts below are examples of the publishing format, not a consecutive trading test. Open the dated source to see the full message and later context.[2]

03How much does VasilyTrader (Free Forex Signals) cost?

The public snapshot contains commercial language about access, membership or another service. A complete current tariff and matching renewal/refund terms have not been established for this review, so no subscription price is presented as confirmed.[2]

04Does the audience size establish signal quality?

No. The 42.7K subscribers display is a dated audience observation. It does not establish verified outcomes, current readership or subscriber profitability.[1][4]

05Have independent customer reviews been checked?

Not for this public-channel snapshot. No external customer rating or verdict is inferred from the provider's own promotional material.[2]

06What determines the place in the TraderStat table?

The Forex table sorts eligible profiles by combined Free + effective Paid result per signal. It requires a positive total result and more than 30 signals; missing or non-positive results do not receive an eligible position. This is separate from audience popularity.[4]

07Has this review completed the 200-signal audit?

No completion claim is made here. Public excerpts, archived rows and completed outcomes are different things; a consecutive 200-signal audit needs its own continuity and outcome checks.[4]

08Are these returns achievable in a subscriber account?

The figures are recorded signal outcomes, with source-defined and modelled cases kept distinct. Position sizing, execution, costs and unfinished trades affect account returns. The review does not establish a subscriber's return.[3][4]

Sources & dates · 6 references
  1. @vasilytrading: public channel snapshot · 2026-10-05 UTC
  2. Dated public web sample: 15 original text posts · 2026-10-05 UTC
  3. TraderStat profile data as loaded (may use a saved snapshot) (archive analysis) · 2026-10-15 UTC
  4. TraderStat signal verification methodology · 2026-10-05 UTC
  5. Public post · 2026-10-05 · 2026-10-05 UTC
  6. Public post · 2026-10-02 · 2026-10-05 UTC

Source excerpts and customer feedback retain their original context and dates. VIP execution is not independently established by this review.

Compare your options

Best Forex traders by average result

Leading profiles in the current directory selection.

Full ranking
#TraderAvg. / signal
1Invezz Signals™41 signals+485.4 pips
2FX INSIGHTS HUB361 signals+120 pips
3facile460 signals+112.9 pips

Available-history selection: combined Free + effective Paid result divided by signal count, with positive total result and more than 30 outcomes. Observation periods differ between providers. Paid imports retain their original provenance. This list is not a reliability score or a ranking of subscriber account returns. Compare public outcomes over a common 90-day window · How to read these results

Available performance
Performance Analysis
Performance is based on recorded public ideas. The weekly view shows the latest 15 recorded weeks in pips, separating profitable and losing periods.