TraderStat

RAY

Raydium

Raydium (RAY) Technical Analysis Today

Raydium #81

$0.6168

Score 56/100

-2.81%
Loading TradingView chart…

На графике показаны паттерны, сформированные на основе анализа сделок и сигналов лучших трейдеров TraderStat.

Market analysis · September 7, 2026

Raydium Technical Analysis for 2026-09-07

A data-led view of trader positioning, market signals, technical indicators, and chart structure.

Signal summary

Why sell

0%share of directional edge to sell

Calculated from 35 TraderStat scores. Only points above or below the neutral 50/100 level count toward the edge.

Market summary

What is the current Raydium view?

The available TraderStat evidence is currently bullish: buyers hold the directional edge based on 35 scored data points.

The two cards above show which data layers create that edge. Scores close to 50/100 are treated as neutral, so only a meaningful deviation changes the buy or sell balance.

Chart structure

What does the chart say?

Chart-pattern score: No data. The chart view combines the latest detected pattern geometry with support and resistance context.

No named pattern is currently available for this timeframe; use the live chart and technical-analysis page for the latest structure.

Decision framework

Bullish and bearish scenarios

Bullish confirmation

The bullish case strengthens if 1d · Technical analysis and 1w · Technical analysis stay above the neutral 50/100 level and the chart confirms the move.

Bearish confirmation

The bearish case strengthens if 15m · Technical analysis remain below 50/100 or the chart invalidates the bullish setup.

Detailed daily analysis

Key Takeaways
  • Current Price: Raydium (RAY) trades at $0.8258 per the latest chart snapshot, a moderate level reflecting mixed signals across timeframes.
  • Overall Sentiment: The data leans cautiously constructive overall, with higher timeframes (1h, 4h) pointing upward while an aggressive bearish pattern on the 15m creates a notable conflict.
  • Lower-Timeframe Conflict: The 15m chart indicates a bearish target, directly opposing the 30m, 1h, and 4h patterns. This dissonance suggests near-term uncertainty.
  • Key Risk: The 15m divergence is the primary risk; if the bearish wedge were to break lower, it could invalidate the higher-timeframe bullish setup.
Overview

Raydium presents a mixed technical profile as of the most recent data. The overall technical score stands at 56/100, just above the neutral 50 midpoint, suggesting a slight bullish tilt. However, the on-chain score sits exactly at 50/100, reflecting a neutral fundamental backdrop without strong directional conviction. The price shows a 24-hour change of +2.74%.

Important nuances
  • The 15m timeframe has a neutral technical score of 49/100, slightly below the neutral 50, while the 30m scores 58/100, above neutral. This score disparity reinforces the short-term conflict.
  • No overall, fundamental, or social scores are available. The overall sentiment is derived from technical and on-chain data only.
  • The current article price of $0.8258 is used as the reference price throughout this analysis.
Lower Timeframe Analysis (15m and 30m)
15-Minute Chart

The 15m timeframe shows a pattern score of 50/100 with a valid, significant pattern detected. Two Wedge formations (medium and large) are identified, with a bearish direction. The target price is $0.7729, below the analysis price of $0.8258, which is valid. The technical score here is 49/100, slightly below neutral.

30-Minute Chart

The 30m timeframe has a pattern score of 59.9/100 with three significant Wedge patterns. The direction is bullish, with a valid target of $0.7730, above the analysis price of $0.7549. The technical score is 58/100, above neutral, indicating a slightly more constructive view compared to the 15m.

Important nuances
  • The 15m and 30m directions directly conflict: the 15m signals bearish while the 30m is bullish. This is the primary short-term conflict that traders must monitor.
  • The RSI on the 15m is 74 (high), while the 30m RSI is 60 (mid-range). The 15m RSI is near overbought territory, which could contribute to exhaustion if the bearish wedge is to be respected.
Higher Timeframe Analysis (1h and 4h)
1-Hour Chart

The 1h chart scores 54.1/100 and shows three Wedge patterns (small, medium, large). The direction is bullish, with a valid target of $0.7994 (above the analysis price of $0.7549). The technical score for this timeframe is 56/100, just above neutral.

4-Hour Chart

The 4h chart scores 50/100 and also shows three Wedge patterns. The direction is bullish, with a valid target of $0.8166 (above the analysis price of $0.7557). The technical score here is 57/100, above neutral.

Important nuances
  • Both higher timeframes align in a bullish direction, providing a multi-timeframe tailwind. This alignment is constructive and suggests underlying momentum.
  • The 4h RSI is 80, which is elevated and near overbought conditions. This could introduce risk of a mean reversion or consolidation, even within the overall bullish setup.
  • No fundamental or social scores are available to corroborate or challenge the technical data.
On-Chain Context and Risks

On-chain data is limited. The on-chain score is a flat 50/100 across all measured timeframes (1h, 1d, 7d, 30d). Key metrics such as fees (24h, 7d, 30d, 1y), DEX volume (24h), TVL, and liquidity data are not available. The only actionable on-chain change comes from chain_tvl_usd where the 7-day change shows -31.87%, a notable contraction, though no absolute value is present to quantify the magnitude.

Important nuances
  • The on-chain data lacks depth, with most fields set to null. The reported stablecoin netflow amounts to $0 across 24h, 7d, and 30d, suggesting no significant capital movement from stablecoins.
  • The 7d chain change of -31.87% could indicate a current of capital leaving the ecosystem, but without a baseline TVL, the market impact is unclear.
  • While the on-chain score is neutral, the negative TVL trend is a passive risk factor that the technical outlook does not account for.
Confirmation and Invalidation Triggers
  • Bullish Confirmation: A move above the 30m target of $0.7730 or, alternatively, a break above the 1h target of $0.7994 would provide higher-timeframe confirmation. Successful retests of either the 1h or 4h analysis prices as support would also be constructive.
  • Bearish Risk: If the 15m bearish wedge target of $0.7729 is reached, it would invalidate the lower-timeframe bullish setup. A break below the 30m analysis price of $0.7549 would add further bearish confirmation on the next higher timeframe.
  • Neutral Zone: The conflicting 15m and 30m directions create a no-trade zone between $0.7549 and $0.8258. A clear directional break outside this band would resolve the conflict.
Short-Term and Long-Term Read

Short-Term (1-3 days): The data presents an ambiguous read. The bearish 15m target is in direct conflict with the 30m, 1h, and 4h bullish patterns. A cautious interpretation is that the price may attempt to grind higher given the multi-timeframe bullish alignment, but the elevated 15m RSI and the presence of a bearish wedge argue for potential short-term exhaustion. The setup does not yet clearly favor one side.

Long-Term (1-4 weeks): The higher timeframes (1h, 4h) are aligned in a bullish direction with valid targets above current levels. The neutral on-chain data and the overall technical score of 56/100 support a gradual upward drift rather than an aggressive breakout. The lack of fundamental or social data leaves the long-term case resting entirely on technical structure. As long as the 15m conflict resolves to the upside and on-chain TVL stabilizes, the data leans toward a gradual bullish continuation. The current price and structure do not yet support a high-conviction long entry.

For the full live dashboard, open the permanent Raydium hub: /crypto/ray/.

Overall Score
56/100
x
Neutral

Combined signal across available data layers.

Timeframe map
Read the signal from D1 to M30
D1 answers whether the environment supports the idea. H1 defines the active setup. M30 is only for execution and should not overturn the daily context.
Evidence, not decoration
Why the rating is 56/100
“Rating pressure” is an estimated direction versus a neutral score of 50. It is deliberately not shown as an exact model weight.

Statistics

24h price change

-2.81%

Analysis coverage

6 timeframes

Data layers

6 independent scores