TraderStat

QNT

Quant

Quant (QNT) Technical Analysis Today

Quant #210

$58.39

Score 44/100

+0.81%
Loading TradingView chart…

На графике показаны паттерны, сформированные на основе анализа сделок и сигналов лучших трейдеров TraderStat.

Market analysis · September 7, 2026

Quant Technical Analysis for 2026-09-07

A data-led view of trader positioning, market signals, technical indicators, and chart structure.

Signal summary

Why sell

91%share of directional edge to sell

Calculated from 35 TraderStat scores. Only points above or below the neutral 50/100 level count toward the edge.

Market summary

What is the current Quant view?

The available TraderStat evidence is currently bearish: sellers hold the directional edge based on 35 scored data points.

The two cards above show which data layers create that edge. Scores close to 50/100 are treated as neutral, so only a meaningful deviation changes the buy or sell balance.

Chart structure

What does the chart say?

Chart-pattern score: No data. The chart view combines the latest detected pattern geometry with support and resistance context.

No named pattern is currently available for this timeframe; use the live chart and technical-analysis page for the latest structure.

Decision framework

Bullish and bearish scenarios

Bullish confirmation

The bullish case strengthens if 1w · Technical analysis and 1d · Technical analysis stay above the neutral 50/100 level and the chart confirms the move.

Bearish confirmation

The bearish case strengthens if Fundamental data and Trader sentiment remain below 50/100 or the chart invalidates the bullish setup.

Detailed daily analysis

Key Takeaways
  • Current Price: Quant (QNT) is trading at $64.81, reflecting a 2.46% gain over the past 24 hours.
  • Overall Sentiment: The combined score is not available, but the 48/100 technical score signals a slightly bearish underlying structure, with higher timeframe data leaning bullish.
  • Timeframe Conflict: The 15m chart shows a bearish wedge target below the current price, while the 30m, 1h, and 4h charts all show bullish wedge targets above. This creates a clear short-term directional conflict.
  • Key Risk: The nearest bearish target at $63.53 on the 15m remains actionable if price fails to hold momentum, while on-chain data provides no supporting context due to widespread null values.
Overview

Quant is currently valued at $64.81, with a 24-hour price change of +2.46%. The overall market rating is not available due to missing fundamental and social scores. The technical score sits at 48, slightly below the neutral 50 midpoint, indicating a mild bearish bias in the pure technical indicators. The on-chain score is exactly 50, showing a neutral fundamental blockchain assessment. The prevailing lower-timeframe pattern setup points to conflict, with the 15m targeting a decline while higher timeframes project bullish continuation.

  • Important nuances: The overall metrics_summary score is marked as null; reliance is placed on the available technical and pattern data. All fundamental and social scores are not available, narrowing the analytical focus to technical and on-chain data.
Lower Timeframe Analysis (15m and 30m)

15m Timeframe: The 15m chart has a pattern score of 53.79 (above the 50 midpoint, indicating slightly above-average pattern significance). It contains 6 lines and 3 significant wedge patterns (small, medium, large). The analysis price is $64.81. The arrow direction is down, and the target of $63.53 is validated as below the analysis price. This is a bearish signal in the short term.

30m Timeframe: The 30m chart holds a pattern score of 57.88, again above 50, confirming better-than-random pattern formation. It uses 8 lines and 3 wedges. The analysis price is $64.10. The arrow direction is up, with a validated bullish target of $65.51, which is above the analysis price. This results in a direct conflict with the 15m bearish target.

Short-Term Conflict: The 15m targets a move downward to $63.53, while the 30m targets a move upward to $65.51. This suggests price may oscillate within a range before a decisive breakout, rather than immediately trending.

  • Important nuances: The 15m and 30m display opposing directional targets. The 15m RSI is elevated at 66, while the 30m RSI has dropped to 36, reinforcing the intraday divergence. Both timeframes show wedges of varying sizes, none with a native directional bias, but their respective arrows and targets differ.
Higher Timeframe Analysis (1h and 4h)

1h Timeframe: The 1h chart has a pattern score of 59.92, well above 50, indicating strong pattern reliability. It contains 6 lines and 3 wedges. The analysis price is $64.10. The arrow direction is up, with a validated target of $68.62. This aligns with the 30m bullish structure and supports a medium-term upward bias.

4h Timeframe: The 4h chart has a pattern score of 50, exactly at the neutral midpoint. It also shows 6 lines and 3 wedges. The analysis price is $64.10. The arrow direction is up, with a validated target of $68.11. While the score is less confident than the 1h, the direction is consistent with the 1h and 30m bullish setups, creating a multi-timeframe bullish confluence above the 15m.

The 1h technical sub-score is 48 (near 50), and the 4h technical sub-score is 53 (slightly above 50). Neither is strongly bearish, and both support the uptrend interpretation.

  • Important nuances: Both higher timeframes show bullish targets and relatively high pattern scores. The 1h RSI is 66, approaching overbought, while the 4h RSI is a cooler 43. The 4h pattern score is exactly 50, which is the neutral boundary for statistical significance.
On-Chain Context and Risks

The on-chain data for Quant is extremely sparse. The source is DefiLlama, but the matched chain and protocol are both null. The on-chain score of 50 is derived from 6 filled metrics, but all dollar-denominated figures (fees, TVL, DEX volume, stablecoin Mcap) are unavailable. The economic activity score, capital velocity score, and dex activity score are all 0. This means no fundamental blockchain activity growth or reduction can be inferred. The neutral score indicates that whatever minimal data exists is neither positive nor negative, but the lack of data itself is a risk—traders cannot use on-chain flows to confirm any price move.

  • Important nuances: The on-chain score is neutral at 50, with zero activity scores. Nearly all on-chain metrics—including fees, TVL, volume, and stablecoin supply—are reported as null. Only stablecoin netflows for 24h, 7d, and 30d are listed at exactly 0.
Confirmation and Invalidation Triggers

Confirmation triggers: A break and hold above the 30m target of $65.51 would confirm the bullish structure across 30m/1h/4h timeframes. Sustained price action above $68.62 (1h target) would confirm the strongest bullish confluence.

Invalidation triggers: A drop below the 15m bearish target of $63.53 would invalidate the lower-timeframe bullish interpretation. If price falls further through $63.53 with volume, the higher-timeframe bullish wedge theories would be challenged. A close below the 15m analysis price of $64.81 would also weaken the short-term bullish case.

  • Important nuances: The 15m and 30m targets create a tight $2.00 trading range ($63.53 to $65.51). The 1h and 4h targets are clustered around $68.11–$68.62.
Short-Term and Long-Term Read

Short-term (1–3 days): The setup leans cautiously bullish on balance, as three of four timeframes (30m, 1h, 4h) point upward. However, the 15m bearish wedge at $63.53 creates a near-term risk of a pullback before continuation. The data does not yet support a clean directional entry without confirmation above $65.51.

Long-term (1–4 weeks): The higher timeframe scores (1h: 48, 4h: 53, 1d: 59, 1w: 60) show a progressive strengthening of technical sentiment as the timeframe lengthens. The 1d and 1w technical scores are comfortably above 50 (59 and 60, respectively), suggesting a solid underlying trend. A cautious interpretation is that the macro setup is constructive for a move toward the $68–$69 area, provided the current intraday conflict resolves to the upside.

Data sourced from TraderStat and Supabase. Explore the full Quant data hub at /crypto/qnt/ .

Overall Score
44/100
x
Neutral

Combined signal across available data layers.

Timeframe map
Read the signal from D1 to M30
D1 answers whether the environment supports the idea. H1 defines the active setup. M30 is only for execution and should not overturn the daily context.
Evidence, not decoration
Why the rating is 44/100
“Rating pressure” is an estimated direction versus a neutral score of 50. It is deliberately not shown as an exact model weight.

Statistics

24h price change

+0.81%

Analysis coverage

6 timeframes

Data layers

6 independent scores