Paid signals research
Arbitrage Scanner (official): paid crypto signals review
Arbitrage Scanner (official)'s paid-signal export contains 426 completed outcomes with a combined result of -734.6% and a 5.4% target-hit rate. The supplied sample finished negative. This review examines the aggregate bot results; individual paid messages and trade times are withheld.
Data imported 2026-09-15. This is the import date, not the trading period.
Why private signals are shown as aggregate results
TraderStat publishes aggregate results for private channels, not their messages, individual trade instructions, timestamps or access links. This is our publication policy to respect creators' rights, confidentiality and channel access terms. Missing public trade details do not mean that no checking took place.
Read the private-signal publication policyPaid signals: aggregate bot results
TraderStat publishes aggregate results for private channels, not their messages, individual trade instructions, timestamps or access links. This is our publication policy to respect creators' rights, confidentiality and channel access terms. Missing public trade details do not mean that no checking took place.
- Completed outcomes
- 426
- Target-hit rate
- 5.4%
- Combined result
- -734.6%
- Targets reached
- 23
- Stops reached
- 385
- Breakeven
- 18
Source checked reports: 1/1. The observation period is unavailable. These are supplied bot results, not independently verified account returns.
What this provider’s record offers
- 426 completed outcomes to examine.
- 1 instrument subtotals, including losses and breakeven outcomes.
- The sample makes negative or flat results visible, rather than showing only wins.
Limitations before choosing
- The trading period is unavailable; consistency and drawdown cannot be established.
- Private messages are withheld under our publication policy, so readers cannot reproduce message-level checks here.
- Results do not include a verified subscriber account or establish subscription value.
What the outcomes show
23 outcomes reached a target, 385 reached a stop and 18 were marked breakeven. Stops account for 90.4% of the sample and breakeven outcomes for 4.2%. The reported win rate includes all three outcomes in its denominator. Excluding breakeven would answer a different question.
The average recorded outcome is -1.7% per signal. Both the frequency of stop outcomes and the size of recorded results matter when examining this losing sample. Without a dated sequence, this record cannot establish drawdown, monthly consistency or recovery time.
Which instruments drive the result?
The export covers 1 instruments. ALPINEUSDT has the largest number of observations: 426 signals, or 100.0% of the complete sample, producing -734.6%. 0 instruments finished positive and 1 finished negative. This is observed coverage in the export, not a claim about the provider's advertised specialities.
Only ALPINEUSDT appears in this market sample, so there is no cross-instrument breakdown to compare. The recorded result is entirely concentrated in this instrument.
Source and verification limits
The source marks 1 of 1 included trader reports as checked; no anomaly flag is present in these reports. These are the supplying bot's labels. TraderStat has reconciled aggregate counts and subtotals, but has not independently rechecked private messages or audited a subscriber account.
Crypto results are sums of individual percentage outcomes. They are not compounded returns on a portfolio: position sizes, overlapping exposure and capital allocation are unknown.
What can this review establish?
Arbitrage Scanner (official)'s record is most useful for examining the 426 supplied outcomes and their distribution across instruments. The source's checked status is useful provenance, but does not establish executable subscriber returns. Observation dates, subscription price, execution costs and account performance are unavailable. No monthly return, consistency claim or assessment of subscription value can be established from this export alone.
Arbitrage Scanner (official): paid results by instrument
All instrument subtotals in this market are included. Sorted by sample size; no signal-level details are published.
| Instrument | Signals | Targets | Stops | Breakeven | Result (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALPINEUSDT | 426 | 23 | 385 | 18 | -734.6 |
Questions about Arbitrage Scanner (official)
Is this a good provider?
Arbitrage Scanner (official)'s record is most useful for examining the 426 supplied outcomes and their distribution across instruments. The source's checked status is useful provenance, but does not establish executable subscriber returns. Observation dates, subscription price, execution costs and account performance are unavailable. No monthly return, consistency claim or assessment of subscription value can be established from this export alone.
Should I copy this provider?
This sample is research evidence, not a recommendation to copy trades. Check comparable dates, risk, costs and your ability to follow the strategy; a positive historical sum does not establish future results.
Why can’t I see the private trades?
TraderStat publishes aggregate results for private channels, not their messages, individual trade instructions, timestamps or access links. This is our publication policy to respect creators' rights, confidentiality and channel access terms. Missing public trade details do not mean that no checking took place.
Are private signals easier to check?
Structured signals with an explicit instrument, direction, entry, target and stop are usually simpler and less expensive to evaluate than open-ended forecasts. This depends on the record, not on whether a subscription is paid.
Continue your research
Use the same market, units and observation period when comparing providers. Free history is a separate sample and does not establish what a paid subscription delivers.