Paid signals research
Gubbins Calls: paid Forex signals review
Gubbins Calls's paid-signal export contains 407 completed outcomes with a combined result of +4,261.2 pips and a 50.1% target-hit rate. The supplied sample finished positive. This review examines the aggregate bot results; individual paid messages and trade times are withheld.
Data imported 2026-09-15. This is the import date, not the trading period.
Paid signals: aggregate bot results
Individual paid messages, dates and trade levels are not published.
- Completed outcomes
- 407
- Target-hit rate
- 50.1%
- Combined result
- +4,261.2 pips
- Targets reached
- 204
- Stops reached
- 185
- Breakeven
- 18
Source checked reports: 0/1. The source flags anomalous results. The observation period is unavailable. These are supplied bot results, not independently verified account returns.
What the outcomes show
204 outcomes reached a target, 185 reached a stop and 18 were marked breakeven. Stops account for 45.5% of the sample and breakeven outcomes for 4.4%. The reported win rate includes all three outcomes in its denominator. Excluding breakeven would answer a different question.
The average recorded outcome is +10.5 pips per signal. A positive average describes this sample only; it does not establish that profits were consistent over time. Without a dated sequence, this record cannot establish drawdown, monthly consistency or recovery time.
Which instruments drive the result?
The export covers 12 instruments. EURJPY has the largest number of observations: 47 signals, or 11.5% of the complete sample, producing -20.9 pips. 10 instruments finished positive and 2 finished negative. This is observed coverage in the export, not a claim about the provider's advertised specialities.
By the stored result unit, XAUUSD has the highest subtotal (+1,653.4 pips from 32 outcomes) and USDCAD has the lowest (-210.1 pips from 32 outcomes). Removing USDCAD leaves +4,471.3 pips across the remaining 375 outcomes. This is a description of concentration, not a recommendation to omit losing instruments after the fact.
Source and verification limits
The source marks 0 of 1 included trader reports as checked and flags 1 for anomalous results. These are the supplying bot's labels. TraderStat has reconciled aggregate counts and subtotals, but has not independently rechecked private messages or audited a subscriber account.
Forex results are expressed in pips. Pips across currencies, metals and indices have different cash values, so neither their sum nor the average measures a dollar return.
What can this review establish?
Gubbins Calls's record is most useful for examining the 407 supplied outcomes and their distribution across instruments. The source anomaly flag makes independent confirmation especially relevant before relying on the headline result. Observation dates, subscription price, execution costs and account performance are unavailable. No monthly return, consistency claim or assessment of subscription value can be established from this export alone.
Gubbins Calls: paid results by instrument
All instrument subtotals in this market are included. Sorted by sample size; no signal-level details are published.
| Instrument | Signals | Targets | Stops | Breakeven | Result (pips) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EURJPY | 47 | 22 | 25 | 0 | -20.9 |
| USDCHF | 43 | 20 | 21 | 2 | +219.2 |
| XAGUSD | 37 | 18 | 17 | 2 | +229.8 |
| EURGBP | 34 | 18 | 15 | 1 | +240.5 |
| GBPUSD | 32 | 22 | 9 | 1 | +1,071.4 |
| NZDUSD | 32 | 15 | 16 | 1 | +77.8 |
| USDCAD | 32 | 13 | 19 | 0 | -210.1 |
| XAUUSD | 32 | 20 | 11 | 1 | +1,653.4 |
| AUDUSD | 31 | 14 | 13 | 4 | +136.2 |
| EURUSD | 30 | 15 | 13 | 2 | +177 |
| GBPJPY | 29 | 14 | 11 | 4 | +463.4 |
| USDJPY | 28 | 13 | 15 | 0 | +223.5 |
Continue your research
Use the same market, units and observation period when comparing providers. Free history is a separate sample and does not establish what a paid subscription delivers.