Paid signals research
Binance Futures Signals: paid Forex signals review
Binance Futures Signals's paid-signal export contains 784 completed outcomes with a combined result of -11,710.2 pips and a 35.5% target-hit rate. The supplied sample finished negative. This review examines the aggregate bot results; individual paid messages and trade times are withheld.
Data imported 2026-09-15. This is the import date, not the trading period.
Paid signals: aggregate bot results
Individual paid messages, dates and trade levels are not published.
- Completed outcomes
- 784
- Target-hit rate
- 35.5%
- Combined result
- -11,710.2 pips
- Targets reached
- 278
- Stops reached
- 480
- Breakeven
- 26
Source checked reports: 0/2. The source flags anomalous results. The observation period is unavailable. These are supplied bot results, not independently verified account returns.
Multiple reports are included. Their overlap is unknown; the count describes export entries.
What the outcomes show
278 outcomes reached a target, 480 reached a stop and 26 were marked breakeven. Stops account for 61.2% of the sample and breakeven outcomes for 3.3%. The reported win rate includes all three outcomes in its denominator. Excluding breakeven would answer a different question.
The average recorded outcome is -14.9 pips per signal. Both the frequency of stop outcomes and the size of recorded results matter when examining this losing sample. Without a dated sequence, this record cannot establish drawdown, monthly consistency or recovery time.
Which instruments drive the result?
The export covers 12 instruments. AUDUSD has the largest number of observations: 77 signals, or 9.8% of the complete sample, producing -643.9 pips. 1 instruments finished positive and 11 finished negative. This is observed coverage in the export, not a claim about the provider's advertised specialities.
By the stored result unit, EURJPY has the highest subtotal (+231.7 pips from 65 outcomes) and XAUUSD has the lowest (-3,888 pips from 69 outcomes). Removing XAUUSD leaves -7,822.2 pips across the remaining 715 outcomes. This is a description of concentration, not a recommendation to omit losing instruments after the fact.
Source and verification limits
The source marks 0 of 2 included trader reports as checked and flags 1 for anomalous results. These are the supplying bot's labels. TraderStat has reconciled aggregate counts and subtotals, but has not independently rechecked private messages or audited a subscriber account. Multiple source reports are included; their observation periods and possible overlap are unknown. The displayed count is export entries, not a confirmed count of unique trades.
Forex results are expressed in pips. Pips across currencies, metals and indices have different cash values, so neither their sum nor the average measures a dollar return.
What can this review establish?
Binance Futures Signals's record is most useful for examining the 784 supplied outcomes and their distribution across instruments. The source anomaly flag makes independent confirmation especially relevant before relying on the headline result. Observation dates, subscription price, execution costs and account performance are unavailable. No monthly return, consistency claim or assessment of subscription value can be established from this export alone.
Binance Futures Signals: paid results by instrument
All instrument subtotals in this market are included. Sorted by sample size; no signal-level details are published.
| Instrument | Signals | Targets | Stops | Breakeven | Result (pips) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDUSD | 77 | 27 | 46 | 4 | -643.9 |
| USDCHF | 76 | 30 | 44 | 2 | -412.9 |
| EURUSD | 73 | 29 | 42 | 2 | -582.2 |
| EURGBP | 70 | 26 | 43 | 1 | -428.7 |
| XAUUSD | 69 | 20 | 47 | 2 | -3,888 |
| EURJPY | 65 | 30 | 33 | 2 | +231.7 |
| NZDUSD | 61 | 23 | 36 | 2 | -222.6 |
| USDJPY | 61 | 19 | 39 | 3 | -1,323.7 |
| GBPJPY | 59 | 20 | 38 | 1 | -1,714.2 |
| USDCAD | 59 | 20 | 37 | 2 | -1,003 |
| GBPUSD | 57 | 16 | 39 | 2 | -1,219.9 |
| XAGUSD | 57 | 18 | 36 | 3 | -502.8 |
Continue your research
Use the same market, units and observation period when comparing providers. Free history is a separate sample and does not establish what a paid subscription delivers.